Göttingen 2019
Description
The European Alchemical Free Energy Workshop was held on May 27-28, 2019. BioExcel, the leading European Centre of Excellence for Computational Biomolecular Research, organized the event with a high-level lineup of speakers from both academia and industry. The current event is hosted and organized by the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry in Göttingen.
Over the two days, the event gathered free energy calculation practitioners and method developers, both from academia and industry. In the spirit of similar previous workshops, we are interested in hearing about use cases, pitfalls and their solutions, as well as challenges and possible paths forward for improvement.
Organization Committee
- Vytautas Gapsys, PhD
- Bert L. de Groot, PhD
- Matteo Aldeghi, PhD
- Petra Kellers, PhD
- John D. Chodera, PhD
Keynote Speaker: William L. Jorgensen
- Institution: Professor, Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, USA
- Title: “FEP for Drug Design Including Computation of Absolute Free Energies of Binding”
Schedule
May 27th, 2019 (Day 1)
| Time (CEST) | Speaker | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 9:00 | Bert L. de Groot | Welcome and Opening Remarks |
| Session Chair: Matteo Aldeghi | ||
| 9:15 | John D. Chodera | Adaptive Free Energy Calculations and Free-Energy Guided Design |
| 9:45 | Antonia Mey | Reproducible Free Energy Workflows with BioSimSpace |
| 10:15 | Niels Hansen | Probing Different Aspects of Stability for the Pin1-WW Domain |
| 10:35 | BREAK | |
| 11:00 | Herman van Vlijmen | Prediction of Activity Cliffs Using FEP+ and Gromacs FEP |
| 11:30 | Peter V. Coveney | Performance of Alchemical Relative Free Energy Calculations With and Without Replica-Exchange |
| 12:00 | Willem Jespers | QligFEP: An Automated Workflow for Small Molecule Free Energy Calculations in Q |
| 12:20 | POSTERS/LUNCH | |
| Session Chair: John D. Chodera | ||
| 2:00 | Clara Christ | From Seven Million to Four - Identifying Novel Covalent Binders for KRASG12C |
| 2:30 | Philip W. Fowler | Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance: The Role of Computational Modelling in Translating Genetics into Clinical Microbiology |
| 3:00 | Vytautas Gapsys | Large Scale pmx/Gromacs Based Non-Equilibrium Free Energy Calculations |
| 3:20 | BREAK | |
| 3:50 | David L. Mobley | Improving the Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations via Enhanced Binding Mode Sampling and Better Force Fields |
| 4:20 | Christina Schindler | Free Energy Calculations in Active Drug Discovery Projects: Use Cases and Challenges |
| 4:40 | William L. Jorgensen | FEP for Drug Design Including Computation of Absolute Free Energies of Binding |
| 5:25 | DISCUSSION |
May 28th, 2019 (Day 2)
| Time (CEST) | Speaker | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Session Chair: Vytautas Gapsys | ||
| 9:00 | Chris Oostenbrink | Applications and Advances in the One-Step Perturbation Approach |
| 9:30 | Daniel Seeliger | Fragment Binding Pose Predictions Using Unbiased Simulations and Markov-State-Models |
| 10:00 | Zoe Cournia | Using Free Energy Perturbation Calculations to Predict Relative Binding Affinities in Drug Design |
| 10:30 | BREAK | |
| 10:50 | Jonathan W. Essex | The Role of Water in Mediating Biomolecular Binding: From Water Locations to Their Impact on Binding Affinity |
| 11:20 | Thomas Steinbrecher | In Silico Lead Optimization via Rapid Exploration of Synthetically Tractable Chemical Space with Combined Free Energy and Machine Learning Approaches |
| 11:50 | Andrea Rizzi | The SAMPL6 SAMPLing Challenge: Assessing the Reliability and Efficiency of Binding Free Energy Calculations |
| 12:10 | POSTERS/LUNCH | |
| Session Chair: Bert L. de Groot | ||
| 1:40 | Philip C. Biggin | ABFE, Water and Chemists: A Useful Combination? |
| 2:10 | Zara Sands | Free Energy Perturbation Calculations: Going Beyond SAR Analysis? |
| 2:40 | Gregory A. Ross | Enhancing Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations With Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations of Water Molecules |
| 3:00 | BREAK | |
| 3:30 | Albert Pan | Using Long-Timescale Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Benchmark Enhanced Sampling Methods |
| 4:00 | Philip Kim | Integrated Design of Novel Biologics |
| 4:20 | Gerhard König | Free Energy Calculation Using a Reference State: Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling (RE-EDS) |
| 4:50 | Bert L. de Groot | Closing Remarks |
Poster Session
======= | Time (CEST) | Speaker | Title | |—————-|————————|————————————| | 9:00 | Bert L. de Groot | Welcome and Opening Remarks | | Session Chair: Matteo Aldeghi | | | | 9:15 | John D. Chodera | Adaptive Free Energy Calculations and Free-Energy Guided Design | | 9:45 | Antonia Mey | Reproducible Free Energy Workflows with BioSimSpace | | 10:15 | Niels Hansen | Probing Different Aspects of Stability for the Pin1-WW Domain | | 10:35 | RREAK | | | 11:00 | Herman van Vlijmen | Prediction of Activity Cliffs Using FEP+ and Gromacs FEP | | 11:30 | Peter V. Coveney | Performance of Alchemical Relative Free Energy Calculations With and Without Replica-Exchange | | 12:00 | Willem Jespers | QligFEP: An Automated Workflow for Small Molecule Free Energy Calculations in Q | | 12:20 | POSTERS/LUNCH | | | Session Chair: John D. Chodera | | | | 2:00 | Clara Christ | From Seven Million to Four - Identifying Novel Covalent Binders for KRASG12C | | 2:30 | Philip W. Fowler | Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance: The Role of Computational Modelling in Translating Genetics into Clinical Microbiology | | 3:00 | Vytautas Gapsys | Large Scale pmx/Gromacs Based Non-Equilibrium Free Energy Calculations | | 3:20 | RREAK | | | 3:50 | David L. Mobley | Improving the Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations via Enhanced Binding Mode Sampling and Better Force Fields | | 4:20 | Christina Schindler | Free Energy Calculations in Active Drug Discovery Projects: Use Cases and Challenges | | 4:40 | William L. Jorgensen | FEP for Drug Design Including Computation of Absolute Free Energies of Binding | | 5:25 | DISCUSSION | |
May 28th, 2019 (Day 2)
| Time (CEST) | Speaker | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Session Chair: Vytautas Gapsys | ||
| 9:00 | Chris Oostenbrink | Applications and Advances in the One-Step Perturbation Approach |
| 9:30 | Daniel Seeliger | Fragment Binding Pose Predictions Using Unbiased Simulations and Markov-State-Models |
| 10:00 | Zoe Cournia | Using Free Energy Perturbation Calculations to Predict Relative Binding Affinities in Drug Design |
| 10:30 | RREAK | |
| 10:50 | Jonathan W. Essex | The Role of Water in Mediating Biomolecular Binding: From Water Locations to Their Impact on Binding Affinity |
| 11:20 | Thomas Steinbrecher | In Silico Lead Optimization via Rapid Exploration of Synthetically Tractable Chemical Space with Combined Free Energy and Machine Learning Approaches |
| 11:50 | Andrea Rizzi | The SAMPL6 SAMPLing Challenge: Assessing the Reliability and Efficiency of Binding Free Energy Calculations |
| 12:10 | POSTERS/LUNCH | |
| Session Chair: Bert L. de Groot | ||
| 1:40 | Philip C. Biggin | ABFE, Water and Chemists: A Useful Combination? |
| 2:10 | Zara Sands | Free Energy Perturbation Calculations: Going Beyond SAR Analysis? |
| 2:40 | Gregory A. Ross | Enhancing Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations With Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations of Water Molecules |
| 3:00 | RREAK | |
| 3:30 | Albert Pan | Using Long-Timescale Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Benchmark Enhanced Sampling Methods |
| 4:00 | Philip Kim | Integrated Design of Novel Biologics |
| 4:20 | Gerhard König | Free Energy Calculation Using a Reference State: Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling (RE-EDS) |
| 4:50 | Bert L. de Groot | Closing Remarks |
Poster Session
| Presenter | Affiliation | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Maximilian Kuhn | Cresset and University of Edinburgh | Developing a Robust Method for Automated Assessment of Binding Affinity via Free Energy Perturbation |
| Martin Werner | Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry | Analysis of Thermodynamic Coupling via Alchemical Free Energy Calculations |
| Gloria Angelica Sandoval-Pérez | University of los Andes | Unveiling the molecular mechanism underlying a bleeding disorder by using free energy calculations |
| Tim Hempel | Free University of Berlin | Calcium sensor proteins: Can we model ion binding free energies as a function of metastable Markov states? |
| Yaozong Li | University of Zurich | Repulsive soft-core potentials for efficient alchemical free energy calculations |
| Joe Bluck | University of Oxford | Towards using absolute binding free energy calculations in the early stages of ligand development |
| Elena Lilkova | Institute of Information and Communication Technologies | Mutation Free Energies of Human Interferon-Gamma Analogues |
| Johannes Dietschreit | LMU Munich | Insights into Chemistry through the Computation of Free Energy Hot-Spots |
| Joan Francesc Gilabert | Barcelona Supercomputing Center | Estimation of absolute and relative binding free energies with PELE |
| Nicolas Künzel | University of Saarland | How Phosphorylation Affects the Binding of C-terminal Peptides to PDZ Domains |
| Gabor Nagy | Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry | 14-3-3 Protein Peptide-binding Pathways from Distance Field Replica Exchange |
| Christian Wennberg | ERCO Pharma AB | Skin permeability modeling using the Martini force field |
| Cecilia Chavez Garcia | The University of Western Ontario | Funnel metadynamics on the Kelch domain of Keap1 |
| Vinaya Kumar Golla | Jacobs University Bremen | Estimation of free energy surfaces for substrate translocation – Metadynamics versus umbrella sampling |
| Ksenia Korshunova | Jülich Research Centre | Combining Force Field-based Hybrid Schemes for Grand-canonical Simulations of Low-resolution Models of GPCRs |
| Israel Cabeza de Vaca Lopez | Yale University | A free energy convergence study for proteins and molecules in solutions through Monte Carlo methods |
| Charles Robert | CNRS | Identifying determinants of RNA affinity and specificity in nuclear proteins regulating organelle gene expression |
| Ruo-Xu Gu | Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry | Lipid-Protein Interactions in Potassium Channel Permeation and Gating |
| Lucia Fusani | GSK and University of Strathclyde | A metadynamics protocol to predict the correct ligand binding pose |
| Simon Boothroyd | MSKCC | An automated, efficient, and scalable framework for the benchmarking of molecular force fields, and estimation of physical properties from molecular simulation |
| Daniel Kuhn | Merck | The Open Force Field Consortium - Open Force Fields in Industrial Pharmaceutical R&D |
| Dimitrios Stamatis | University of Athens | Alchemical Free Energy Calculations of Aminoadamantanes Bound to the Closed State of Influenza A/M2TM |
| Paul Czodrowski | TU Dortmund University | Future plans for the Statistical Assessment of the Modeling of Proteins and Ligands project |
| Ravi Tripathi | Ruhr University Bochum | Exploring the complex free-energy landscape of hGBP1 GTPase and its mutants utilizing ab initio QM/MM metadynamics simulations |
| Jan Walther Perthold | BOKU Vienna | Automated Free Energy Calculation for Drug Design: Accelerated Enveloping Distribution Sampling |
| Martin Reinhardt | Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry | Determining Free Energy Differences Through Variational Morphing |
| Ying-Chih Chiang | University of Southampton | Relaxation-Augmented Free Energy Perturbation |
| Mazen Ahmad | Max Planck Institute for Informatics | Relative Principal Components Analysis |
| Magnus Lundborg | ERCO Pharma | Calculating permeability through skin |
| Zhiyi Wu | Univeristy of Oxford | Proton-control of transitions in an amino-acid transporter |
| Christoph Öhlknecht | BOKU Vienna | Net Charge Changes in the Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies via Classical Atomistic MD Simulation |
| Jigneshkumar Dahyabhai Prajapati | Jacobs University Bremen | Minimum free energy pathways of ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin across a bacterial pore |
| Ennys Gheyouche | University of Nantes | Exploration Of The Activation Mechanism Of Small GTPase RhoA |
| Clemens Rauer | Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research | Machine Learning of Hydration Free Energies |
| Bernadette Mohr | Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research | Optimization of drug-membrane selectivity from free-energy calculations |
| Alexander Kötter | University of Münster | Standard binding free energies of SIM SUMO complexes |
| Narendra Kumar | Ruhr University Bochum | Molecular Dynamics Study of Pressure-induced Effects on the Self-cleavage Catalysis Reaction of Hairpin Ribozyme |
| Steffen Wolf | University of Freiburg | Dissipation-corrected targeted molecular dynamics for the calculation of free energies and friction factors from non-equilibrium simulations of protein-ligand unbinding |
| Pierre Matricon | Uppsala University | Structure-Based Ligand Design by Targeting an Ordered Water: Interact, Displace, or Replace? |
| Martin Carballo-Pacheco | University of Edinburgh | Building fitness landscapes for antimicrobial resistance from free energy calculations |
| Efpraxia Tzortzini and Margarita Stampelou | University of Athens | Development of binding free energy computational models for GPCRs using the MM-PBSA method |
| Angelo Spinello | SISSA | Exploiting Enhanced Sampling Methods to Design Novel Allosteric Inhibitors of the Aromatase Enzyme |
| Tanadet Pipatpolkai | University of Oxford | PIP2 Modulation of KATP Channel and Disease |
| David F. Hahn | ETH Zurich | Multiple-replica λ-dynamics for the Calculation of Alchemical Free-Energies: The Conveyor Belt Thermodynamic Integration (CBTI) scheme |
| Emmi Pohjolainen | University of Jyväskylä | Exploring Strategies for Labeling Viruses with Gold Nanoclusters through Non-equilibrium Molecular Dynamics Simulations |
| Willem Jespers | Uppsala University | Ligand and Sidechain Mutations by FEP Simulations: Two Sides of The Same Coin |
| Dimitris Ntekoumes | Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens | Free Energy Calculations as a Tool for Lead Optimization in Drug Discovery |